THE INFLUENCE OF REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS ON LOGISTICS FINANCING STRATEGIES
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper examines the influence of regulatory frameworks on logistics financing strategies, highlighting how government policies and regulations shape the financial landscape for logistics providers. As the logistics sector continues to evolve amidst increasing globalization and technological advancements, understanding the impact of regulatory environments on financing options becomes critical for ensuring operational efficiency and competitiveness. The study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative data analysis of financing trends and regulatory changes with qualitative insights from interviews with logistics managers, financial experts, and policymakers. The findings reveal that regulatory frameworks significantly affect access to financing, risk assessment, and the overall cost of capital for logistics companies. Additionally, the paper identifies key regulatory challenges that can hinder effective financing strategies, such as bureaucratic hurdles, compliance costs, and varying standards across jurisdictions. By exploring best practices and case studies of logistics companies that have successfully navigated regulatory environments, this research provides actionable recommendations for stakeholders to enhance their financing strategies in line with regulatory requirements. Ultimately, this paper underscores the importance of aligning logistics financing strategies with regulatory frameworks to promote sustainable growth and resilience in the logistics sector.
Article Details
References
Edunjobi, T. E. (2024). Sustainable supply chain financing models: Integrating banking for enhanced sustainability. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research Updates 2024, 7(02), 001-011.
Feng, B., Feng, C., & Zhao, S. (2023). Green Supply Chain Finance Credit Market under Government Regulation: An Evolutionary Game Theory Analysis. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 32(5), 3999-4010.
Bals, C. (2019). Toward a supply chain finance (SCF) ecosystem–Proposing a framework and agenda for future research. Journal of purchasing and supply Management, 25(2), 105-117.
Tukhtabaev, J. S., Turaev, H. Y., Kasimov, A. A., Bondarskaya, T. A., Ochilov, A. O., Bondarskaya, O. V., ... & Irisbayeva, S. D. (2023, December). Problems of security of economic and ecological systems in the countries of the central Asian Region. In International Conference on Next Generation Wired/Wireless Networking (pp. 177-195). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Shoh-Jakhon, K. (2023). Theoretical and Methodological Aspects of Intensive Economic Growth in Ensuring Sustainable Economic Development. Social and Economic Studies within the Framework of Emerging Global Developments Volume 3, 283.
Khamdamov, S. J., & Usmanov, A. (2022). New methodological recommendations for economic growth. Архив научных исследований, 2(1).
Jakhon, K. S. (2021). Analysis of factors of intensive economic growth in Uzbekistan. JournalNX, 7(12), 310-315.
Mamadiyorov, Z., Sultanova, N., Makhmudov, S., Khamdamov, S. J., Mirpulatova, L., & Jumayev, A. (2023, December). The Impact of Digitalization on Microfinance Services in Uzbekistan. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Future Networks and Distributed Systems (pp. 453-463).
Lam, H. K., & Zhan, Y. (2021). The impacts of supply chain finance initiatives on firm risk: evidence from service providers listed in the US. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 41(4), 383-409.
Wu, J., Yue, L., Li, N., & Zhang, Q. (2024). Financing a Capital-Constrained Supply Chain under Risk Regulations: Traditional Finance versus Platform Finance. Sustainability, 16(17), 7268.
Alora, A., & Barua, M. K. (2019). Barrier analysis of supply chain finance adoption in manufacturing companies. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 26(7), 2122-2145.